DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choël, L
Right arrow Articles by Guillot, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choël, L
Right arrow Articles by Guillot, G
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2004) 33, 177-182
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/42933309


RESEARCH

Trabecular alveolar bone microarchitecture in the human mandible using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging

L Choël*,1, D Last2, F Duboeuf3, MJ Seurin4, M Lissac5, A Briguet4 and G Guillot2

1 Laboratoire de RMN, CNRS UMR 5012 and Laboratoire des Interfaces en Odontologie EA 637, Département des Sciences Anatomiques, Faculté d'Odontologie, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, France; 2 U2R2M, CNRS UMR8081, Bât 220, Université Paris-Sud 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; 3 Hôpital Edouard Herriot – INSERM U403 Lyon, France; 4 Laboratoire de RMN, CNRS UMR 5012, Université Claude Bernard – ESCPE Lyon, France; 5 Département des Sciences Anatomiques, Laboratoire des Interfaces en Odontologie EA 637, Faculté d'Odontologie, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, France

*Correspondence to: Docteur Léon Choël, 4, rue Eugène Manuel, 69100 Villeurbanne, France; Email: choel{at}univ-lyon1.fr

Received 15 September 2003; revised 3 February 2004; accepted 26 February 2004

Objectives: Cancellous bone microarchitecture in the mandible can influence the success of dental implant osseointegration. The aims of this study were to explore the feasibility of two-dimensional (2D) high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of trabecular bone architecture and to compare architecture parameters derived from MR images between different areas in the mandible, and between sex and dental status.

Methods: 45 mandibular bone specimens (8 mm thickness) were cut from 15 fresh cadavers. MR images were obtained at 2 T using a multislice 2D spin-echo sequence. After MR image binarization, histomorphometry parameters, i.e. bone area fraction (BAF), specific perimeter (La), trabecular bone width (Tb.Wi), trabecular bone separation (Tb.Sp) and trabecular network anisotropy (R), were computed from the mean intercept length. The angle {theta} between trabeculae and tooth axis and the Euler-Poincaré characteristics (EPCs) were also computed.

Results: BAF, Tb.Wi and R were significantly higher in male specimens compared with female specimens, whereas Tb.Sp was significantly lower. The apparent Tb.Wi was found to be significantly higher in dentate specimens compared with edentulous ones. The highest anisotropy, corresponding to the smallest R value, was seen in the incisal specimens. The preferential orientation of the trabeculae was close to perpendicular to the tooth axis, especially in the molar specimens.

Conclusion: BAF, La, Tb.Wi, Tb.Sp and R, the most variable parameters, may potentially have a relationship with the biomechanical competence of trabecular bone and play a role both in primary stabilization of dental implant and the time needed before loading.

Keywords: MRI; trabecular bone; mandible; alveolar process; bone density; microarchitecture







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.