DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sener, S
Right arrow Articles by Akgünlü, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sener, S
Right arrow Articles by Akgünlü, F
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2004) 33, 245-252
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17738454


RESEARCH

MRI characteristics of anterior disc displacement with and without reduction

S Sener* and F Akgünlü

Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Konya, Turkey

*Correspondence to: Sevgi Sener, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Campus, Konya, Turkey; Email: sevgi_sener{at}hotmail.com

Received 22 January 2004; revised 25 May 2004; accepted 1 June 2004

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDR) and without reduction (ADDWR).

Methods: A clinician and a radiologist, blinded to the results of the clinical examination, independently evaluated the MRI scans of 100 subjects with symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. The final sample included 88 subjects in whom there was consensus of disc displacement both between observers and between MRI and clinical examination. There were 130 joints with ADDR and 45 joints with ADDWR in the study. The MRI characteristics such as position, signal intensity and morphology of the disc, degenerative changes, effusion, scar tissue, osteonecrosis and condylar hypermobility were evaluated in the cases of ADDR and ADDWR. The {chi}2 test was used to determine the differences between ADDR and ADDWR for these MRI characteristics.

Results: There were no significant differences between ADDR and ADDWR for effusion and degenerative changes. There were significant differences between ADDR and ADDWR for sideways displacement, disc deformation, signal intensity changes, scar tissue, osteonecrosis and condylar hypermobility.

Conclusions: Degenerative changes and effusion did not appear to be markers of either ADDR or ADDWR. However, the severity of these abnormalities may be correlated with the type of internal derangement. The prevalence of sideways displacement, disc deformation, signal intensity changes, scar tissue, and osteonecrosis was greater in ADDWR than ADDR. These conditions may be considered to be indicators of more advanced and complicated stages of internal derangement. Because the percentage of subluxation was greater in ADDR, localized joint laxity and internal derangement may be correlated.

Keywords: TMJ; MRI; anterior disc displacement




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
K Orhan, C Delilbasi, and C. Paksoy
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of mandibular condyle bone marrow and temporomandibular joint disc signal intensity in anaemia patients
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2009; 38(5): 247 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.