DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y-J
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H-F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y-J
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H-F
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2004) 33, 301-306
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85147715


RESEARCH

Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system

Y-J Chen1,2, S-K Chen*,1,3, H-W Huang2, C-C Yao1,2 and H-F Chang1,2

1 School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2 Department of Orthodontics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 3 Division of Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

*Correspondence to: Dr Ssu-Kuang Chen, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Chang-Te Street, Taipei 100, Taiwan; Email: cskchen{at}ccms.ntu.edu.tw

Received 23 March 2004; revised 15 June 2004; accepted 30 June 2004

Objectives: To compare the cephalometric landmark identification on softcopy and hardcopy of direct digital cephalography acquired by a storage-phosphor (SP) imaging system.

Methods: Ten digital cephalograms and their conventional counterpart, hardcopy on a transparent blue film, were obtained by a SP imaging system and a dye sublimation printer. Twelve orthodontic residents identified 19 cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed SP digital images with computer-aided method and on their hardcopies with conventional method. The x- and y-coordinates for each landmark, indicating the horizontal and vertical positions, were analysed to assess the reliability of landmark identification and evaluate the concordance of the landmark locations in softcopy and hardcopy of SP digital cephalometric radiography.

Results: For each of the 19 landmarks, the location differences as well as the horizontal and vertical components were statistically significant between SP digital cephalometric radiography and its hardcopy. Smaller interobserver errors on SP digital images than those on their hardcopies were noted for all the landmarks, except point Go in vertical direction. The scatter-plots demonstrate the characteristic distribution of the interobserver error in both horizontal and vertical directions. Generally, the dispersion of interobserver error on SP digital cephalometric radiography is less than that on its hardcopy with conventional method.

Conclusions: The SP digital cephalometric radiography could yield better or comparable level of performance in landmark identification as its hardcopy, except point Go in vertical direction.

Keywords: storage-phosphor cephalometric radiography; digital imaging; landmark identification




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
V Kumar, J. Ludlow, A Mol, and L Cevidanes
Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 36(5): 263 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.