DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dutra, V
Right arrow Articles by Susin, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dutra, V
Right arrow Articles by Susin, C
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2004) 33, 323-328
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17685970


RESEARCH

Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs

V Dutra*,1,2, J Yang1, H Devlin3 and C Susin4

1 Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology, Medicine, and Surgery, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2 Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Clinic, Rua Alvares Machado, 44/405, cep 90630-010, POA-RS, Brazil; 3 The Dental School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 4 Department of Periodontology, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA

*Correspondence to: Dr Vinicius Dutra, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Clinic, Rua Alvares Machado, 44/405, cep 90630-010, POA-RS, Brazil; Email: cdiodontologia{at}terra.com.br

Received 25 April 2004; revised 11 August 2004; accepted 15 August 2004

Objectives: To evaluate the changes in the antegonial angle, antegonial depth and gonial angle in edentulous and dentate patients in different age groups and between genders.

Methods: We evaluated 312 panoramic radiographs selected from our files. The images were grouped into four 10-year age groups (by decades). The youngest age group was 40–49 years and the oldest 70–79 years. Gender, dentition status and age were recorded. Measurements were made by two observers.

Results: No significant differences were observed for the gonial angle regarding age, gender and edentulism. For antegonial angle, the males (160.86°±0.78) had significantly smaller values than females (165.08°±0.58) irrespective of the dental status (P<0.0001). Edentulous individuals (161.51°±0.83) had a smaller antegonial angle than dentate (165.05°±0.76) and partially dentate (163.81°±0.81) individuals (P<0.05). The antegonial depth was significantly greater for males than females (2.12 mm±0.09 vs 1.46 mm±0.07, P<0.0001). Edentulous individuals (1.87 mm±0.1) had significantly greater antegonial depth than dentate and partially dentate individuals (1.60 mm±0.1 and 1.65 mm±0.1, respectively).

Conclusion: The gonial angle did not show any change with gender, age and dental status whereas the antegonial region had a resorptive pattern in the edentulous mandible. The morphology of the antegonial region was influenced by gender and dental status.

Keywords: radiography; mandible; bone remodelling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
N. Nohadani and S. Ruf
Assessment of vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiography
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2008; 30(3): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.