DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira Júnior, O
Right arrow Articles by Lauris, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira Júnior, O
Right arrow Articles by Lauris, J.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2004) 33, 373-378
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/54063729


RESEARCH

Simple bone cyst versus odontogenic keratocyst: differential diagnosis by digitized panoramic radiography

O Ferreira Júnior*,1, JH Damante1 and JRP Lauris2

1 Department of Stomatology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil; 2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Collective Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil

*Correspondence to: Osny Ferreira Júnior, Departamento de Estomatologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru - Universidade de São Paulo, Al. Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75 – V. Universitária, Bauru - SP – CEP 17012-101, Brazil; Email: osnyfjr{at}fob.usp.br

Received 13 November 2003; revised 22 July 2004; accepted 9 August 2004

Objectives: To identify the contour and pixel grey levels of simple bone cyst (SBC) and odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) images that might contribute to differentiating between the two lesions.

Methods: Panoramic radiographs of 32 SBC and 20 OKC were digitized and analysed by six examiners. The contours of the images were classified as indistinct, distinct without a sclerotic border, and distinct with a sclerotic border. The presence or absence of scalloping and the pixel grey levels of the radiolucent part of the images were also determined.

Results: The sclerotic border was more frequent in the OKC, especially in the posterior segment (P=0.0301). The presence of scalloping was more frequent in the superior segment of the SBC (P=0.0295). The pixel values were higher in the OKC than in the SBC images (P=0.00134).

Conclusions: Details about the contour and pixel grey levels of OKC and SBC assist in the diagnosis of these lesions.

Keywords: simple bone cyst; Odontogenic keratocyst; panoramic radiography; digital radiography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
Radiology Quiz Case 1: Diagnosis
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2006; 132(7): 804 - 804.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.