DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Güneri, P
Right arrow Articles by Kendir, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Güneri, P
Right arrow Articles by Kendir, S
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2005) 34, 20-27
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85029529


RESEARCH

The effects of incremental brightness and contrast adjustments on radiographic data: a quantitative study

P Güneri*,1, G Lomçali1, H Boyacioglu2 and S Kendir2

1 Ege University School of Dentistry, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey; 2 Ege University Faculty of Science, Department of Statistics, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey

*Correspondence to: Pelin Güneri, Ege University School of Dentistry, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey; Email: peleen_2000{at}yahoo.com; pelin{at}dent.ege.edu.tr

Received 3 September 2004; revised 25 October 2004; accepted 8 November 2004

Objectives: To determine the border level of brightness and contrast changes in order to prevent the loss of originality of the quantitative data on digital dental radiographs.

Methods:  After measuring the baseline mean grey values (MGVs) of a fixed region of interest on the alveolar bone and an aluminium step wedge, incremental brightness and contrast adjustments were performed on a digital periapical radiograph. The distribution of the data was analysed to investigate the significance of the changes on radiodensitometric data after incremental increase of brightness and contrast.

Results: The original MGVs were easily retrieved after brightness adjustments; however, the contrast increase led to more complicated density changes. The originality of the data was saved up to 50 units of contrast increase, but further than this limit, significant radiodensitometric changes occurred.

Conclusions: Contrast adjustments should be performed cautiously when making quantitative analyses on the digital radiographs.

Keywords: dental radiography; image enhancement; quantitative analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
S. K. Lanning, A. M. Best, H. J. Temple, P. S. Richards, A. Carey, and L. K. McCauley
Accuracy and consistency of radiographic interpretation among clinical instructors using two viewing systems.
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2006; 70(2): 149 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.