DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yilmaz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sayin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yilmaz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sayin, M.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2005) 34, 32-35
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/57695636


RESEARCH

Prevalence of tooth transpositions and associated dental anomalies in a Turkish population

HH Yilmaz*,1, H Türkkahraman2 and MÖ Sayin2

1 Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey; 2 Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

*Correspondence to: Hasan Hüseyin Yilmaz, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Süleyman Demirel University, Dogu Kampus, Cunur, Isparta, Turkey; Email: hyilmaz{at}dishek.sdu.edu.tr, huseyinyeni{at}yahoo.com

Received 8 June 2004; revised 3 December 2004; accepted 3 December 2004

Objectives: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of tooth transposition in a Turkish population, possibly associated dental anomalies and whether side laterality, gender expression or genetic influence exist or not.

Methods: Panoramic radiographs of 5486 patients referred to Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, University of Süleyman Demirel between April 2003 and March 2004 were examined retrospectively. All patients with tooth transpositions were recalled for detailed clinical examination and medical history. Age, sex, history (trauma), location of transposition, and associated congenital dental anomalies were recorded with details.

Results: 22 transpositions were found in 21 of 5486 (0.38%) patients. The most frequently seen transposition was maxillary canine-lateral incisor (1.64/1000), secondly maxillary canine-first premolar (0.91/1000) and maxillary canine-second premolar (0.18/1000) was the least frequently seen one. The frequencies of right and left side occurrence were equal (11/11). Each sex was affected similarly (11 males, 10 females).

Conclusions: The prevalence of tooth transposition was 0.38% in a Turkish population. Maxillary canine-lateral incisor transposition was found to have a higher frequency than maxillary canine-first premolar transposition. Maxillary canine-second premolar transposition that had not been previously reported in the literature was observed in one of our cases. Transpositions had similar frequencies in both sexes.

Keywords: transposition; prevalence; tooth abnormalities; aetiology




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S. Camilleri, C.M. Lewis, and F. McDonald
Ectopic Maxillary Canines: Segregation Analysis and a Twin Study
J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2008; 87(6): 580 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.