DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebolt, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebolt, C.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2005) 34, 67-73
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/99945885


REVIEW

An overview of radiographic film holders

DA Dixon*,1 and CF Hildebolt2

1 Southern Illinois University School of Dental Medicine, Alton, IL, USA; 2 Department of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA

*Correspondence to: Debra Dixon, 2800 College Avenue, Bldg. 288, Alton, Illinois 62002, USA; E-mail: ddixon{at}siue.edu

Received 17 August 2004; revised 13 January 2005; accepted 23 January 2005

Objectives: To provide an overview of radiographic film holders, from their inception in the early 1900s to present day.

Methods: A Medline literature search was conducted for dental studies that used keywords that pertain to radiographic film holders. Hand searches of the bibliographies were also conducted. Sixty articles (dating from 1896 to 1998) that describe new or improved film holders are reviewed here.

Results: From the earliest days of dental radiography, dentists attempted to standardize radiographic images and techniques. The focus of researchers in the 1950s to the 1970s was to develop a film holder that would hold the film and allow easy and predictable alignment of the X-ray tube. As research projects became more dependent on dental radiographic measurements, the focus shifted to producing reproducible radiographic images, from which highly repeatable measurements could be made.

Conclusion: Existing devices have strengths and weaknesses. Readily available devices are adequate for routine clinical use; however, user-friendly and patient-friendly film-holding devices that result in highly reliable and accurate measurements have yet to be introduced.

Keywords: radiography; dental; digital; subtraction technique/radiography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
A. Gegler and V. Fontanella
In vitro evaluation of a method for obtaining periapical radiographs for diagnosis of external apical root resorption
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2008; 30(3): 315 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
R. Couture, D. Dixon, and C. Hildebolt
A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2005; 34(4): 231 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.