DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sant'Ana, L.
Right arrow Articles by Capelozza, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sant'Ana, L.
Right arrow Articles by Capelozza, A.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2005) 34, 96-101
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/29844316


RESEARCH

Clinical evaluation of the effects of radiographic distortion on the position and classification of mandibular third molars

LFM Sant'Ana*, FPM Giglio, O Ferreira, Jr, E Sant'Ana and ALA Capelozza

Department of Stomatology, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75; Vila Universitária, Bauru-Sp; Brazil, CEP: 17.090-100

*Correspondence to: Dr LFM Sant'Ana, Department of Stomatology, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75; Vila Universitária, Bauru-Sp; Brazil, CEP 17.090-100; E-mail: lfmsantana{at}uol.com.br

Received 3 November 2003; revised 27 September 2004; accepted 19 October 2004

Objective: Panoramic radiographs are routinely employed for surgical planning of unerupted third molars. The objective of this study was to evaluate distortions in the position of mandibular third molars on panoramic radiographs.

Material and methods: Panoramic radiographs of 14 patients with indication for extraction of the mandibular third molars were used. Transurgical impressions of the crowns of the teeth to be extracted and adjacent second molars (n=19) were achieved with addition silicone and poured with type IV plaster for comparison of the inclinations of the third molars on the radiographs and study casts.

Results: There was a mean difference of –5.37° between the position of the third molar on the panoramic radiograph and on the study cast (standard deviation 1.46, P<0.05, Student's t-test).

Conclusion: There is distortion in the position of teeth on the panoramic radiograph, which may influence the surgical planning; however, this does not invalidate it as the main tool for diagnosis and surgical planning of mandibular third molars.

Keywords: radiography; panoramic; image distortion; impacted tooth; third molars







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.