This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gijbels, F Articles by Sanderink, G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gijbels, F Articles by Sanderink, G

Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure

¹ Oral Imaging Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium; ² Unit of Personal Dosimetry, Radiation Therapy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium; ³ Oral Radiology, ACTA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

*Correspondence to: Reinhilde Jacobs, Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; E-mail: reinhilde.jacobs{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be

Received 15 September 2004; revised 13 January 2005; accepted 16 January 2005

Objectives: To measure patient radiation dose during panoramic exposure with various panoramic units for digital panoramic imaging.

Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was filled with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD 100^®) and exposed with five different digital panoramic units during ten consecutive exposures. Four machines were equipped with a direct digital CCD (charge coupled device) system, whereas one of the units used storage phosphor plates (indirect digital technique). The exposure settings recommended by the different manufacturers for the particular image and patient size were used: tube potential settings ranged between 64 kV and 74 kV, exposure times between 8.2 s and 19.0 s, at fuse current values between 4 mA and 7 mA. The effective radiation dose was calculated with inclusion of the salivary glands.

Results: Effective radiation doses ranged between 4.7 µSv and 14.9 µSv for one exposure. Salivary glands absorbed the most radiation for all panoramic units. When indirect and direct digital panoramic systems were compared, the effective dose of the indirect digital unit (8.1 µSv) could be found within the range of the effective doses for the direct digital units (4.7–14.9 µSv).

Conclusions: A rather wide range of patient radiation doses can be found for digital panoramic units. There is a tendency for lower effective doses for digital compared with analogue panoramic units, reported in previous studies.

Keywords: dental radiography; panoramic radiography; digital imaging; radiation dose

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Connor, T Arscott, J Berry, L Greene, and R O'Gorman Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 36(5): 270 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Gijbels, R Jacobs, D Debaveye, R Bogaerts, S Verlinden, and G Sanderink Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: occupational exposure Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 34(3): 150 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]