DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshiura, K
Right arrow Articles by Kawazu, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshiura, K
Right arrow Articles by Kawazu, T
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2005) 34, 350-352
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/13550415


RESEARCH

Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility

K Yoshiura*, K Okamura, K Tokumori, E Nakayama, T Chikui, TK Goto, M Shimizu and T Kawazu

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

*Correspondence to: Kazunori Yoshiura, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan; E-mail: yoshiura{at}rad.dent.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Received 4 February 2005; accepted 30 March 2005

Objectives: To correlate diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries with perceptibility of low contrast image details using regression analysis. The other purpose was to determine the attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis.

Methods: The results of the two types of observer performance tests described above were retrieved from previous studies. Recording media included in those studies were the Compuray and the Dixel, direct digital radiographic systems, and Ektaspeed Plus film. The average numbers of perceptibility of image details from five observers were calculated for each step and for every combination of contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom from the perceptibility test. The average diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries from the same five observers was correlated with the total number of perceptible details from the phantom using regression analysis. Finally, attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis was calculated from the attenuation range of the phantom where the maximum correlation coefficient was obtained.

Results: Maximum correlation (r=0.68) was obtained at the combination of five contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom. Attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis corresponded to the 2 mm to 6 mm thickness of aluminium with acrylic block of 12 mm thickness.

Conclusions: There is a correlation between perceptibility of low contrast image details and diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries. There may be a possibility to simplify observer performance tests for proximal caries diagnosis by using the standardized phantom simulating its attenuation range.

Keywords: radiography; dental; digital radiography; dental; diagnostic accuracy; caries




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
E Alpoz, E Sogur, and B. Baksi Akdeniz
Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 36(8): 490 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.