DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parissis, N
Right arrow Articles by Patias, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parissis, N
Right arrow Articles by Patias, P
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2005) 34, 353-356
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/99611204


RESEARCH

Conventional radiographs vs digitized radiographs: image quality assessment

N Parissis*,1, A Kondylidou-Sidira1, A Tsirlis1 and P Patias2

1 Dental School, Department of Oral Surgery, Implantology and Roentgenology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; 2 Department of Cadastre, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Laboratory of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

*Correspondence to: Dr A Kondylidou-Sidira, Dental School, Department of Oral Surgery, Implantology and Roentgenology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Greece; E-mail: nkondyli{at}dent.auth.gr

Received 14 June 2003; revised 7 March 2005; accepted 30 March 2005

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare image quality characteristics of conventional radiographs and their digital counterparts.

Methods: 100 conventional radiographs (E-speed) were used for the evaluation of density and contrast. The radiographs were made using a range of exposures under standardized conditions and were compared with digital images that resulted from scanning the above radiographs with a commercially available scanner. Resolution was evaluated with an experiment using 50 film packets and a resolution target exposed with different exposure times, using both the original radiographs and their scanned equivalents.

Results: The digitized radiographs appeared to be of higher density than the conventional ones. Moreover, they demonstrated a narrower density range. Resolution was similar for both types of images.

Conclusions: Although there is an agreement with the literature that the digitized radiographs are of higher density, further investigation is required to detect the various factors that may have an effect on the quality of the digitized images.

Keywords: dental radiography; digital image; scanner; density; contrast; resolution




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A De Rossi, M De Rossi, L. Rocha, L. da Silva, and M. Rossi
Morphometric analysis of experimentally induced periapical lesions: radiographic vs histopathological findings
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.