This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cevidanes, L. Articles by Turvey, T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cevidanes, L. Articles by Turvey, T

Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients

¹ Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, USA; ² Department of Computer Sciences, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, USA; ³ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, USA

*Correspondence to: Lucia HS Cevidanes, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, 201 Brauer Hall, University of North Carolina, CB#7450, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7450, USA; E-mail: cevidanl{at}dentistry.unc.edu

Received 3 February 2005; revised 8 April 2005; accepted 23 April 2005

Objectives: To evaluate the registration of 3D models from cone-beam CT (CBCT) images taken before and after orthognathic surgery for the assessment of mandibular anatomy and position.

Methods: CBCT scans were taken before and after orthognathic surgery for ten patients with various malocclusions undergoing maxillary surgery only. 3D models were constructed from the CBCT images utilizing semi-automatic segmentation and manual editing. The cranial base was used to register 3D models of pre- and post-surgery scans (1 week). After registration, a novel tool allowed the visual and quantitative assessment of post-operative changes via 2D overlays of superimposed models and 3D coloured displacement maps.

Results: 3D changes in mandibular rami position after surgical procedures were clearly illustrated by the 3D colour-coded maps. The average displacement of all surfaces was 0.77 mm (SD=0.17 mm), at the posterior border 0.78 mm (SD=0.25 mm), and at the condyle 0.70 mm (SD=0.07 mm). These displacements were close to the image spatial resolution of 0.60 mm. The average interobserver differences were negligible. The range of the interobserver errors for the average of all mandibular rami surface distances was 0.02 mm (SD=0.01 mm).

Conclusion: Our results suggest this method provides a valid and reproducible assessment of craniofacial structures for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. This technique may be used to identify different patterns of ramus and condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.

Keywords: cone-beam CT; 3D models; superimposition

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E Hirsch, U Wolf, F Heinicke, and M A G Silva Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 37(5): 268 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Stratemann, J. Huang, K Maki, A. Miller, and D. Hatcher Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 37(2): 80 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]