DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasar, F
Right arrow Articles by Akgünlü, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasar, F
Right arrow Articles by Akgünlü, F
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2006) 35, 1-9
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/97652136


RESEARCH

The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis

F Yasar* and F Akgünlü

Selcuk Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Oral Diagnoz ve Radyoloji Anabilim Dali, 42079 Konya Turkey

*Correspondence to: Füsun Yasar, Selcuk Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Oral Diagnoz ve Radyoloji Anabilim Dali, 42079 Konya Turkey; E-mail: drfyasar{at}hotmail.com

Received 1 October 2004; revised 12 April 2005; accepted 12 May 2005

Objectives: The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationship between osteoporosis, oral signs, body mass index and age; and to assess the possibility of using these parameters as an indicator of post-menopausal osteoporosis. The oral signs were panoramic-based mandibular indices, such as cortical width, cortical index, panoramic mandibular index and mandibular crest resorption degree; the number of teeth and fractal dimension analysis.

Methods: Forty-eight post-menopausal women between the ages of 40 years and 64 years were evaluated. Mandibular indices and the number of mandibular teeth were measured and evaluated from panoramic radiographs and fractal dimension was calculated from the direct digital periapical radiographs of the mandibular premolar-molar region in box-counting method. Weight, height, menopausal status and age of the patients were recorded by questionnaire. Bone mineral densities of the patients were measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Results: In this study there were no statistically significant differences between the osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients for cortical width, panoramic mandibular index, alveolar crest resorption degree, fractal dimension and the number of mandibular teeth, but there was a difference for cortical index. Binary logistic regression analyses demonstrated that age (P=0.015) was an important risk factor for osteoporosis.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that osteoporotic patients were more likely to have altered inferior cortex morphology than non-osteoporotic patients and age is an important risk factor for osteoporosis.

Keywords: osteoporosis;; panoramic radiography;; digital radiography;; fractal dimension




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
S Ergun, A Saracoglu, P Guneri, and B Ozpinar
Application of fractal analysis in hyperparathyroidism
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2009; 38(5): 281 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
F Yasar, S Sener, E Yesilova, and F Akgunlu
Mandibular cortical index evaluation in masked and unmasked panoramic radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2009; 38(2): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.