DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sund, T
Right arrow Articles by Møystad, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sund, T
Right arrow Articles by Møystad, A
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2006) 35, 133-138
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/21936923


RESEARCH

Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality

T Sund*,1 and A Møystad2

1 Telenor Research and Development, Fornebu, Norway; 2 Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway

*Correspondence to: Torbjørn Sund, Telenor R&D, Snarøyveien 30, N-1331 Fornebu, Norway; Email: torbjorn.sund{at}telenor.com

Received 19 January 2005; revised 21 August 2005; accepted 11 September 2005

Objectives: To investigate whether contrast enhancement by non-interactive, sliding window adaptive histogram equalization (SWAHE) can enhance the image quality of intraoral radiographs in the dental clinic.

Methods: Three dentists read 22 periapical and 12 bitewing storage phosphor (SP) radiographs. For the periapical readings they graded the quality of the examination with regard to visually locating the root apex. For the bitewing readings they registered all occurrences of approximal caries on a confidence scale. Each reading was first done on an unprocessed radiograph ("single-view"), and then re-done with the image processed with SWAHE displayed beside the unprocessed version ("twin-view"). The processing parameters for SWAHE were the same for all the images.

Results: For the periapical examinations, twin-view was judged to raise the image quality for 52% of those cases where the single-view quality was below the maximum. For the bitewing radiographs, there was a change of caries classification (both positive and negative) with twin-view in 19% of the cases, but with only a 3% net increase in the total number of caries registrations. For both examinations interobserver variance was unaffected.

Conclusions: Non-interactive SWAHE applied to dental SP radiographs produces a supplemental contrast enhanced image which in twin-view reading improves the image quality of periapical examinations. SWAHE also affects caries diagnosis of bitewing images, and further study using a gold standard is warranted.

Keywords: dental radiography; digital images; algorithms; dental caries







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.