DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Morais, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scaf, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Morais, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scaf, G
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2006) 35, 139-142
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31981949


RESEARCH

Accuracy of zoomed digital image in the detection of periodontal bone defect: in vitro study

JAND de Morais1, CE Sakakura1, LCM Loffredo2 and G Scaf*,1

1 Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery, Araraquara Dental School, State of São Paulo University, Unesp, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil; 2 Department of Social Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, State of São Paulo University, Unesp, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil

*Correspondence to: Dr Gulnara Scaf, Rua Humaitá, 1680, 14801-903, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil; Email: scaf{at}foar.unesp.br

Received 3 August 2004; revised 14 June 2005; accepted 12 July 2005

Objectives: (1) To evaluate the intraobserver agreement related to image interpretation and (2) to compare the accuracy of 100%, 200% and 400% zoomed digital images in the detection of simulated periodontal bone defects.

Methods: Periodontal bone defects were created in 60 pig hemi-mandibles with slow-speed burs 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm and 3.0 mm in diameter. 180 standardized digital radiographs were made using Schick sensor and evaluated at 100%, 200% and 400% zooming. The intraobserver agreement was estimated by Kappa statistic ({kappa}). For the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed followed by chi-square test to compare the areas under ROC curves according to each level of zooming.

Results: For 100%, 200% and 400% zooming the intraobserver agreement was moderate ({kappa}=0.48, {kappa}=0.54 and {kappa}=0.43, respectively) and there were similar performances in the discrimination capacity, with ROC areas of 0.8611 (95% CI: 0.7660–0.9562), 0.8600 (95% CI: 0.7659–0.9540), and 0.8368 (95% CI: 0.7346–0.9390), respectively, with no statistical significant differences ({chi}2-test; P=0.8440).

Conclusions: A moderate intraobserver agreement was observed in the classification of periodontal bone defects and the 100%, 200% and 400% zoomed digital images presented similar performances in the detection of periodontal bone defects.

Keywords: dental radiography;; digital radiography;; radiographic zooming;; alveolar bone loss;; agreement;; accuracy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.