DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akkaya, N
Right arrow Articles by Arslan, U
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akkaya, N
Right arrow Articles by Arslan, U
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2006) 35, 170-174
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/26750940


RESEARCH

Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries

N Akkaya*,1, Ö Kansu1, H Kansu1, LB Çagirankaya1 and U Arslan2

1 Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Ankara, Turkey; 2 Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence to: Nursel Akkaya, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Dishekimligi Fakültesi, Oral Diagnoz ve Radyoloji Anabilim Dali, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Türkiye; Email: ynursel{at}hacettepe.edu.tr

Received 21 March 2005; revised 13 July 2005; accepted 30 July 2005

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiographic surveys in the diagnosis of proximal caries according to the different dental regions (maxillary and mandibular incisor, canine, premolar and molar).

Methods: In this study, full mouth series and panoramic radiographs of 79 patients were used. The radiographs were evaluated for proximal caries by three observers. The diagnostic accuracy of radiographic surveys for each dental region was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Full mouth series was the most efficient method in the diagnosis of caries for incisor and canine teeth. However, full mouth series and combination of panoramic plus bitewings had similar diagnostic accuracy for premolar and molar teeth.

Conclusions: Panoramic survey alone was not sufficient for the diagnosis of proximal caries for the entire dentition. The combination of panoramic plus bitewing plus anterior periapical survey exhibited a diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries that was comparable with full mouth series.

Keywords: panoramic radiography; dental radiography; dental caries; ROC curve




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
I Peker, M Toraman Alkurt, and B Altunkaynak
Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 36(8): 495 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.