DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bozic, M
Right arrow Articles by Ihan Hren, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bozic, M
Right arrow Articles by Ihan Hren, N
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2006) 35, 178-184
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/79749065


RESEARCH

Osteoporosis and mandibles

M Bozic* and N Ihan Hren

Department of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

*Correspondence to: Marko Bozic, MD, Department of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Email: marko.bozic{at}medscape.com

Received 23 March 2005; revised 18 July 2005; accepted 31 August 2005

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to find out whether mandibular bone tissues on dental panoramic tomograms (DPTs) are statistically significantly different between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic women. We wanted to develop a simple method of common DPT analysis that could represent a simple, inexpensive and readily available screening tool for osteoporosis.

Methods: DPT images of 36 women with primary osteoporosis were compared with 20 DPT images of non-osteoporotic women of the same age group. Scanned DPTs were analysed using public computer software. Mandibular atrophy was assessed by six anatomic indexes. Anatomic indexes were divided into subgroups regarding the presence of teeth. Relative bone density (RBD) was assessed using a colour histogram (CH) plugin. Nine RBD indexes were calculated as relations of CH values measured on specific sites of the mandible.

Results: The subtractions of average values of anatomic indexes with and without a tooth were 1.5 to 2.5 times higher in the osteoporotic group of women. Average of RBD indexes differed statistically significantly between the groups (P<0.05). Three RBD indexes differed statistically significantly between groups (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Mandibular bone tissues on DPTs are statistically significantly different between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic women. RBD of the mandible is statistically significantly lower in the osteoporotic group of women. We developed a simple method of common DPT analysis, which could represent a simple, inexpensive and readily available screening tool for osteoporosis.

Keywords: osteoporosis; bone density; mandible; radiography; panoramic







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.