DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinzinger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Diedrich, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kinzinger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Diedrich, P.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2006) 35, 347-356
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/70972585


RESEARCH

Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the disc-condyle relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part II)

GSM Kinzinger*,1, A Roth1, N Gülden1, A Bücker2 and PR Diedrich1

1 Department of Orthodontics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany; 2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany

*Correspondence to: Dr Gero Kinzinger, Department of Orthodontics, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30. D-52074 Aachen, Germany; Email: gkinzinger{at}ukaachen.de

Received 27 June 2005; revised 31 October 2005; accepted 25 November 2005

Objectives: This study aimed to verify the effects that corrective treatment for skeletal Class II malocclusions with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances has on the relative positions of the articular disc and the mandibular condyle.

Methods: Orthodontic treatment progress was monitored in 20 patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at four defined points in time. Visual inspection of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) was performed on three slices each (lateral, central, medial) of closed-mouth and maximum-open parasagittal MRI. Metric analysis was performed on the central slices of the images obtained in the closed-mouth position. To assess the positional relationship in the sagittal dimension between the articular disc and the mandibular condyle, both methods were used.

Results: The comparison of pre-treatment and post-treatment findings revealed in none of the joints that the disc-condyle relationship had been adversely affected as a consequence of the treatment. Rather, the outcome was an improved relationship in a total of eight joints. After groups of joints had been defined by disc position, metric analysis revealed a significantly improved positional relationship in those joints in which an anterior disc displacement had been found initially.

Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment with a rigid, fixed functional appliance to correct skeletal distoclusion results in the following side effects on the disc-condyle relationship in the TMJ: the treatment does not have adverse effects on initially physiological disc-condyle relationships; in TMJs with initial partial or total anterior disc displacement, improved disc position can be achieved.

Keywords: orthodontic treatment; bite jumping; magnetic resonance imaging; disc-condyle relationship







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.