DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munhoz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Granjeiro, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munhoz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Granjeiro, J.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2006) 35, 371-375
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/64880289


RESEARCH

Radiographic assessment of impacted mandibular third molar sockets filled with composite xenogenic bone graft

EA Munhoz1, O Ferreira Junior*,2, RYF Yaedu1 and JM Granjeiro3

1 Department of Radiology and Stomatology, Bauru Dental School, São Paulo University, Al. Otávio Pinheiro Brizola 9-75, Bauru, SP, 17012-901, Brazil; 2 Department of Surgery, Bauru Dental School, São Paulo University, Al. Otávio Pinheiro Brizola 9-75, Bauru, SP, 17012-901, Brazil; 3 Department of Biological Science, Bauru Dental School, São Paulo University, Al. Otávio Pinheiro Brizola 9-75, Bauru, SP, 17012-901, Brazil

*Correspondence to: Dr O Ferreira Junior, Department of Surgery, Bauru Dental School, São Paulo University, Al. Otávio Pinheiro Brizola 9-75, Bauru, SP, 17012-901, Brazil; Email: osnyfjr{at}fob.usp.br

Received 8 August 2005; revised 8 November 2005; accepted 25 November 2005

Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic aspect of the healing of extraction sockets filled with a xenogenic graft material (Gent-techTM).

Methods: Thirty-nine patients ranging in age from 15 years to 25 years with bilateral impacted mandibular molars were chosen based on bilateral mandibular similarities. After tooth extraction, the socket was filled with the graft. The opposite site was left to heal naturally and served as a control. The experimental and control sites were chosen randomly. Bone density and crest healing were evaluated on digital radiographs taken immediately, 2 months and 6 months after surgery. The respective pixels values obtained with the Digora software were compared statistically.

Results: The results showed a significant decrease in the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the alveolar bone crest, but no difference was found between the control and experimental groups. Bone density increased significantly, and there was difference between experimental and control groups.

Conclusion: The analysed parameters observed by the authors were similar to those of the control group, suggesting xenogenic graft being an acceptable material and a graft option.

Keywords: third molars; bone grafting; xenogenic bone; digital direct radiography







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.