This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pinsky, H. Articles by Sarment, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pinsky, H. Articles by Sarment, D.

Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT

¹ University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1011 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078 USA; ² Department of Radiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, 1011 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078 USA; ³ Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1011 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078 USA

*Correspondence to: David Sarment, DDS, MS,Email: sarment{at}umich.edu

Received 9 November 2005; revised 27 December 2005; accepted 5 January 2006

Objectives: Lesions causing intraosseous defects in the head and neck region are difficult to diagnose using two-dimensional radiography, and three-dimensional (3D) data provided by CT is useful but often difficult to obtain. Recently, cone-beam CT (CBCT) was made available, with the potential to become a practical tool in dentistry. However, there is limited evidence to prove that defect volume can be determined accurately. Therefore, this in vitro validation study aimed at establishing whether linear and 3D CBCT, using volumetric measurements, is accurate for determining osseous defect sizes.

Methods: Depth and diameter of simulated bone defects in (i) an acrylic block and (ii) a human mandible were blindly measured electronically by five examiners using CBCT. Linear measurements were compared with predetermined machined dimensions. Using software, volume extraction was performed by another examiner on the acrylic phantom and compared with known dimensions. Data were analysed using paired t-tests.

Results: Using the acrylic block, mean width accuracy was –0.01 mm (±0.02 SE) and mean height difference was –0.03 mm (±0.01 SE; P>0.05). For the human mandible, mean width accuracy was –0.07 mm (±0.02 SE) and mean height accuracy was –0.27 mm (±0.02 SE; P<0.01). Volume accuracy was –6.9 mm³ (±4 SE) for automated calculations and –2.3 mm³ (±2.6 SE) for the manual measurements (P<0.001).

Conclusions: CBCT has the potential to be an accurate, non-invasive, practical method to reliably determine osseous lesion size and volume. Further clinical validation will lead to a vast array of applications in oral and maxillofacial diagnosis.

Keywords: CT; osseous defect; periapical diseases; diagnostic imaging

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P Sutthiprapaporn, K Tanimoto, M Ohtsuka, T Nagasaki, Y Iida, and A Katsumata Positional changes of oropharyngeal structures due to gravity in the upright and supine positions Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2008; 37(3): 130 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Stratemann, J. Huang, K Maki, A. Miller, and D. Hatcher Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 37(2): 80 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]