DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiese, M
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiese, M
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, A
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2007) 36, 12-17
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/78486936


RESEARCH

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ

M Wiese*,1,2, H Hintze1, P Svensson3 and A Wenzel1

1 Department of Oral Radiology, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark; 2 Department of Radiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3 Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

*Correspondence to: Mie Wiese, Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Noerre Allé 20, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; Email: mwi{at}odont.ku.dk

Received 28 September 2005; revised 3 February 2006; accepted 1 March 2006

Objective: To compare diagnostic accuracy of tomograms obtained with film and three digital image receptor modalities for detection of morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

Methods: Lateral and frontal cross-sectional tomograms of 158 TMJs in 80 dry human skulls were obtained with four X-ray receptors: one conventional film (Agfa-Gevaert), two photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates: VistaScan and Digora PCT and one charge-coupled device (CCD): ProMax. The film and the PSP plate tomograms were exposed in a Cranex Tome X-ray unit and the CCD tomograms in the ProMax X-ray unit. The tomograms were examined by three observers for the presence of morphological changes in the condyle, the mandibular fossa and the articular tubercle. Naked-eye inspection of the articular surfaces of the TMJs performed by the same three observers served as the gold standard for the true presence of morphological changes.

Results: For examination of TMJ changes using lateral and frontal tomograms in combination and lateral tomograms separately, the ProMax modality obtained a significant lower diagnostic accuracy than the other three modalities, between which no significant differences were found. For morphological changes localized to the condyle in which the highest number of changes were present according to the gold standard, the same result was found.

Conclusion: The ProMax modality was significantly less accurate than the film, VistaScan and Digora PCT modalities for the detection of overall TMJ morphological bone changes as well as condylar bone changes.

Keywords: radiography; temporomandibular joint; digital radiography; modalities; tomography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
H Hintze, M Wiese, and A Wenzel
Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 192 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.