DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suomalainen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Peltola, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suomalainen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Peltola, J.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2007) 36, 80-85
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30358216


RESEARCH

The 3DX multi image micro-CT device in clinical dental practice

AK Suomalainen*,1,2, A Salo2, S Robinson1 and JS Peltola1,3

1 Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; 2 Suomen Terveystalo Hammaslaseri, Helsinki, Finland; 3 Department of Oral Radiology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, Finland

*Correspondence to: Anni Suomalainen, Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 263 (Kasarmikatu 11-13), FI-00029 HUS, Finland; Email: anni.suomalainen{at}hus.fi

Received 31 December 2004; revised 21 December 2005; accepted 28 December 2005

Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of 3DX multi-image micro-CT device in clinical dental practice.

Methods: Images of 198 examinations performed with a 3DX device during a 6 month period in a private dental practice were evaluated retrospectively for the benefit of additional information compared with panoramic or intraoral radiographs.

Results: The main indication for the use of 3DX micro-CT was planning of dental implant placement in 49% of the examinations. Diagnosis or exclusion of dental infection or peri-implantitis represented 28% of the examinations and tooth, root or foreign body localization represented 13%. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) imaging and cyst or tumour diagnosis represented 7.5% and 2.5% of the examinations, respectively. In implant planning and tooth, root or foreign body localization examinations, the required information was obtained in every case except three implant planning examinations, in which the exact measurements were hampered by artefacts caused by root fillings and retrograde fillings or metal posts. When compared with conventional radiography, additional radiographic information was obtained in 51% of the micro-CT examinations performed to confirm or exclude dental infection or peri-implantitis. Micro-CT also showed the bone structure of TMJs precisely.

Conclusions: The 3DX micro-CT device visualizes bony anatomical structures precisely, which makes it a reliable tool for, for example, planning of implant treatment. The device is highly suitable for diagnosing dental infections. Dental restorations may cause disturbing artefacts and in 4.5% of the examinations the small imaging area resulted in re-examination.

Keywords: diagnostic imaging; radiography,; dental,; digital; X-ray computed tomography (CT); dentistry,; operative







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.