DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J
Right arrow Articles by Li, X
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J
Right arrow Articles by Li, X
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2007) 36, 160-167
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/38484807


RESEARCH

Radiographic examination of 41 cases of odontogenic myxomas on the basis of conventional radiographs

J Zhang, H Wang*, X He, Y Niu and X Li

Department of Oral Radiology, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

*Correspondence to: Hu Wang, Department of Oral Radiology, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China; Email: wanghu200108{at}163.com

Received 11 January 2006; revised 16 June 2006; accepted 25 June 2006

Objective: There are some different radiographic appearances of odontogenic myxoma that have not been reported in the published literature. The purpose of this article is to offer rare views of odontogenic myxomas and analyse the characteristics of the radiographic appearances.

Materials and methods: We reviewed the radiographic appearances of 41 cases of odontogenic myxomas on conventional radiographs, recruited from patients who visited the Department of Oral Radiology, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University between 1964 and 2005. The diagnoses of the cases were verified by histopathology.

Results: On conventional radiographs, odontogenic myxomas presented varying radiographic appearances, which could be divided into six types as follows: Type I—unilocular; Type II—multilocular (including honeycomb, soap bubble and tennis racquet patterns); Type III—involvement of local alveolar bone; Type IV—involvement of the maxillary sinus; Type V—osteolytic destruction and Type VI—a mix of osteolytic destruction and osteogenesis.

Conclusion: Odontogenic myxoma has variable radiographic appearances on conventional radiographs. This classification system helps us better understand the radiographic appearances of odontogenic myxoma on conventional radiographs.

Keywords: odontogenic myxoma; radiograph; odontogenic tumour







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.