This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mupparapu, M Articles by Janal, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mupparapu, M Articles by Janal, M

Comparison of re-exposure rates of intraoral radiographs between dental students and trained dental assistants in an oral and maxillofacial radiology clinic

¹ Department of Diagnostic Sciences, UMDNJ–New Jersey Dental School, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, USA; ² Department of Psychiatry, UMDNJ–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA

*Correspondence to: Dr Muralidhar Mupparapu, DMD, MDS, Diagnostic Sciences, D-860, UMDNJ–New Jersey Dental School, 110 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, USA; Email: m.mupparapu{at}umdnj.edu

Received 21 September 2005; revised 10 April 2006; accepted 23 May 2006

Objective: To compare the re-exposure rates of dental radiographs taken over a period of 1 year between dental students and trained dental assistants at a university-based oral and maxillofacial radiology clinic.

Methods: Detailed records of the number and type of intraoral radiographs taken by the students and staff members and the number of re-exposures that were required from July 2003 to July 2004 were used. Statistical analyses were performed on the data.

Results: A ² test showed that re-exposure rates of radiographic series between students and staff were statistically different. When comparing the students' re-exposure rates during each of the four quarters of their radiology rotation, one-way analysis of variance test showed that the results were not statistically significant for reduction in the number of re-exposures over the entire year.

Conclusions: There were significant differences in the re-exposure rates between staff dental assistants and students. Film re-exposure rates for the students during the four quarters were expected to decrease with time. Instead, the consistency of the re-exposure rates of the students during the four quarters demonstrates the need to recognize why the students did not perform better as the year progressed. The percentage of films that needed to be re-exposed by either group (students or the staff dental assistants) was not extremely high.

Keywords: re-exposure rate; radiographs; rectangular collimator; dental student; dental assistant