This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bousquet, F Articles by Vazquez, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bousquet, F Articles by Vazquez, L

Transtomography for implant placement guidance in non-invasive surgical procedures

¹ Private Practice, Montpellier, France; ² Department of Perio Implantology, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; ³ Department of Stomatology, Oral Surgery and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

*Correspondence to: Frédéric Bousquet, 82 avenue d' Assas, 34000 Montpelier, France; Email: bousquet.frederic{at}libertysurf.fr

Received 30 November 2005; revised 3 May 2006; accepted 18 June 2006

Objectives: To illustrate the use of transtomography for the placement of implants using a radiopaque radiographic guide and to evaluate the accuracy of transtomography.

Methods: The study included 11 implants inserted with minimally invasive procedures. Pre-operative, intraoperative and post-operative examinations were performed with a ProMax panoramic unit implemented with transtomographic technique (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). At each implant site, cross-sectional and longitudinal intraoperative transtomograms were taken through a radiopaque reference guide to control and adjust the drilling axis. The effective axis on post-operative transtomograms was compared with the planned axis correction estimated on intraoperative images. Radiopaque guides, used as the gold standard, were measured on intraoperative cross-sectional slices to evaluate image distortion.

Results: Intraoperative transtomograms, with the reference guide inserted in the bone, gave clear images of the cortical plates and accurate information of drilling length and axis, which allowed the surgeon to adjust pilot drilling axis in 6 sites (54.5%) out of 11 sites, including sites with narrow bone ridges. The implant axis on the post-operative tomogram compared with the planned axis correction showed an angle difference ranging from 0.8° to 3.4°. The image distortion on cross-sectional slices ranged from 0.03 mm to 0.52 mm, resulting in a distortion ratio ranging from 0% to 6% when expressed in percentages.

Conclusions: Transtomographic examination performed with a radiographic reference guide during implant surgery can provide the necessary and accurate information for implant placement. Transtomography distortion appears to be less important than in other conventional tomographic systems and comparable with CT scan distortion.

Keywords: dental implants; tomography; distortion; mandible