This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Kawamura-Hagiya, Y Articles by Suda, H PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kawamura-Hagiya, Y Articles by Suda, H

Logistic regression equation to screen for vertical root fractures using periapical radiographs

Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan

Yoko Kawamura-Hagiya, Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan; E-mail: y.kawamura.endo{at}tmd.ac.jp

Received 5 October 2006; revised 23 January 2007; accepted 18 January 2007

Objectives: To develop a predictive equation to screen for vertical root fractures (VRFs) by numerically evaluating the shapes of radiolucent areas on the periapical radiographs of endodontically treated maxillary incisors and premolars.

Methods: 41 pre-operative periapical radiographs of maxillary incisors and premolars with radiolucent areas at root apices were used. Out of 41 teeth, 18 had a fractured root (VRF group) and 23 had a non-fractured root (non-VRF group). The periapical radiolucent area of each tooth was traced out by six examiners on a personal computer and two indices, "Complexity" and "Radial SD", were measured. For each index, the difference between the VRF and non-VRF groups and the interexaminer differences were analysed with two-way ANOVA at 5% significance level. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to develop a predictive equation and the probability of VRF in all samples was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to select the optimal cut-point. Each sample was predicted as "VRF" or "non-VRF" with this cut-point.

Results: For both "Complexity" and "Radial SD", the VRF group showed significantly greater values than the non-VRF group (P<0.05). With a cut-point derived from the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity and efficiency of VRF were 0.68, 0.80 and 0.75, respectively.

Conclusions: VRF teeth have more complicated radiolucent areas compared with non-VRF teeth. By evaluating the shapes of radiolucent areas, a logistic regression equation to screen for VRF was calculated and this equation could contribute to the diagnosis of VRF.

Keywords: logistic models; periapical periodontitis; radiography, dental; tooth fracture