This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Goren, A. Articles by Colosi, D. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goren, A. Articles by Colosi, D.

Radiation exposure with the NOMAD^TM portable X-ray system

¹ Department of General Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, SUNY Stony Brook, New York, NY, USA, ² Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, SUNY Stony Brook, New York, NY, USA, ³ Department of Radiological Health Services, Suffolk County, New York, NY, USA

*Correspondence to: Dr Arthur Goren, School of Dental Medicine, 129 Westchester Hall, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. E-mail: agoren{at}notes.cc.sunysb.edu

Received 21 August 2007; revised 29 October 2007; accepted 21 November 2007

Objectives: A new hand-held battery-operated portable X-ray system was tested for possible leakage radiation through the existing heavy metal compounds surrounding the X-ray tube, backscatter radiation through the lead-filled acrylic shield attached at the end of the exit tube and patient exposure.

Methods: Dose measurements were conducted using a DXTRR phantom and a water phantom. All measurements were recorded using calibrated thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD), calibrated Unfors Model 583L dosemeter, and a calibrated Radcal MDH model 1015 dosemeter. The settings for all exposure were 60 kVp, 2.3 mA and 0.25 s using Kodak Insight (Class F) film.

Results: All backscatter measurements, in front of the shield, behind the shield, at the finger of the operator, the operator's chest, eyes and gonads were significantly below the maximum permissible radiation leakage as per the United States Food and Drug Administration regulations (100 mR h^–1). Our measurements indicate that the exposure would be well within the occupational maximum permissible dose for an occupationally exposed person. Film dose was consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations. As a result of our measurements, the State of New York Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection granted us a variance to use the NOMAD^TM on a case-by-case basis.

Conclusions: Our data have shown that the NOMAD^TM presents risks that are no greater than with standard dental radiographic units to the patient or operator and the measured doses are well below recommended levels.

Keywords: hand-held portable X-ray unit, thermoluminescent, dosimetry, radiation safety