DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lofthag-Hansen, S
Right arrow Articles by Gröndahl, K
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lofthag-Hansen, S
Right arrow Articles by Gröndahl, K
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2008) 37, 72-79
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/60375385

RESEARCH

Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD

S Lofthag-Hansen*,1, A Thilander-Klang2, A Ekestubbe3, E Helmrot4 and K Gröndahl3

1 Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden, 2 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden, 3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Sweden, 4 Department of Radiation Physics, Linköping University Hospital, Sweden

*Correspondence to: S Lofthag-Hansen, Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Medicinaregatan 12 C, SE-413 90 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail: sara.lofthag-hansen{at}vgregion.se

Received 31 January 2007; revised 22 May 2007; accepted 23 May 2007

Objectives: This study evaluates two methods for calculating effective dose, CT dose index (CTDI) and dose–area product (DAP) for a cone beam CT (CBCT) device: 3D Accuitomo at field size 30x40 mm and 3D Accuitomo FPD at field sizes 40x40 mm and 60x60 mm. Furthermore, the effective dose of three commonly used examinations in dental radiology was determined.

Methods: CTDI100 measurements were performed in a CT head dose phantom with a pencil ionization chamber connected to an electrometer. The rotation centre was placed in the centre of the phantom and also, to simulate a patient examination, in the upper left cuspid region. The DAP value was determined with a plane-parallel transmission ionization chamber connected to an electrometer. A conversion factor of 0.08 mSv per Gy cm2 was used to determine the effective dose from DAP values. Based on data from 90 patient examinations, DAP and effective dose were determined.

Results: CTDI100 measurements showed an asymmetric dose distribution in the phantom when simulating a patient examination. Hence a correct value of CTDIw could not be calculated. The DAP value increased with higher tube current and tube voltage values. The DAP value was also proportional to the field size. The effective dose was found to be 11–77 µSv for the specific examinations.

Conclusions: DAP measurement was found to be the best method for determining effective dose for the Accuitomo. Determination of specific conversion factors in dental radiology must, however, be further developed.

Keywords: radiation dosimetry; limited cone beam computed tomography






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.