DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seneadza, V
Right arrow Articles by Eickholz, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seneadza, V
Right arrow Articles by Eickholz, P
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2008) 37, 142-148
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/51572889

RESEARCH

Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries

V Seneadza1, A Koob1, J Kaltschmitt2, H J Staehle2, J Duwenhoegger3 and P Eickholz*,4

1 Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Clinic of Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, 2 Section of Periodontology, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Clinic of Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, 3 Private Practice, Heidelberg, Germany, 4 Department of Periodontology, Center for Dental, Oral, and Maxillofacial Medicine, Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany

*Correspondence to: Prof. Dr Peter Eickholz, Poliklinik für Parodontologie, ZZMK (Carolinum), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany; E-mail: eickholz{at}med.uni-frankfurt.de

Received 2 April 2007; revised 22 July 2007; accepted 23 July 2007

Objectives: Evaluation of a particular digital caries image-enhancing mode (filter) for its effect on the validity of measurements of caries lesion depth.

Methods: Standardized radiographs of 44 extracted teeth exhibiting interproximal caries lesions were obtained. Six radiographs were obtained of each tooth and digitized. Four radiographs were made using D-speed film with and without soft tissue scattering equivalent (STSE) at normal exposure time (0.32 s) and underexposed (0.16 s). Two were made using E-speed film with STSE normally (0.16 s) and underexposed (0.08 s). On each of the 264 radiographs, 4 independent examiners measured the central depth (CD) of 1 carious lesion per tooth both on the unchanged radiographic image and after use of the filter. Histometric CD assessments provided a gold standard for comparison with the radiographic measurements (validity). Repeated measures ANOVA was calculated for validity in relation to examiner, lesion type, filter, film type, exposure time and STSE.

Results: The lesion type was identified to statistically significantly influence the validity of CD measurements. Examiner in combination with defect type (P<0.001), filter (P = 0.017), exposure (P = 0.027) and film type (P = 0.044) had an additional albeit small effect.

Conclusions: The lesion type significantly influenced the validity of CD measurements: enamel lesions were less underestimated than dentin lesions.

Keywords: dental caries; radiology, diagnostic X-ray; radiographic image enhancement; validity






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.