DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dangore, S B
Right arrow Articles by Bhowate, R R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dangore, S B
Right arrow Articles by Bhowate, R R
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2008) 37, 205-212
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/57023901


RESEARCH

Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy

S B Dangore*, S S Degwekar and R R Bhowate

Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Sawangi (M), Wardha. Maharashtra, India

*Correspondence to: Dr Suwarna B Dangore, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, DMIMS, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra 442004, India. E-mail: dangore_suwarna{at}rediffmail.com

Received 14 June 2007; revised 28 July 2007; accepted 28 July 2007

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) to differentiate between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.

Methods: During a period of 12 months, 100 untreated patients with clinical evidence of cervical lymphadenopathy (50 patients with clinically suspected malignant/metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy and 50 patients with clinically suspected reactive/benign cervical lymphadenopathy) were prospectively evaluated with CDUS. CDUS was performed for 168 cervical lymph nodes in these 100 patients. Histopathological confirmations were obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy and/or excisional biopsy. To evaluate the efficacy of CDUS, comparison between clinical features, CDUS features and cytological/histological features of enlarged cervical lymph nodes was then done.

Results: Initially, clinical examination evaluated 143 cervical lymph nodes. CDUS evaluation discovered additional 25 lymph nodes (143+25 = 168). Correlation of patterns of colour Doppler flow signals with pathological diagnosis showed that central flow for benign nodes and peripheral flow for malignant nodes were highly significant parameters (P < 0.01). CDUS has a higher specificity than clinical evaluation, being 94.28% and 58.76%, respectively. Accuracy of the CDUS examination was also definitely higher than clinical evaluation at 92.85% and 63.67%, respectively.

Conclusions: Nodal vascularity can be used to differentiate benign from malignant lymphadenopathy. Proper judicious CDUS examination provides an opportunity to eliminate the need for biopsy/FNAC in reactive nodes.

Keywords: cervical lymphadenopathy; colour Doppler ultrasound; histopathology







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.