This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Olszewski, R Articles by Zech, F PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Olszewski, R Articles by Zech, F

Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph

¹Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saint Luc University Clinics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; ²Department of Medical Imaging, Saint Luc University Clinics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; ³Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Saint Luc University Clinics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium;, ⁴Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Luc University Clinics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

*Correspondence to: Raphael Olszewski, DDS, MD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. H Reychler), Av. Hippocrate 10, Saint Luc University Clinics, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: raphael.olszewski{at}stom.ucl.ac.be

Received 13 June 2007; revised 26 September 2007; accepted 26 September 2007

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to compare the accuracy of cephalometric landmark identification using three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) surface rendering with "high-dose" (200 mAs) and "low-dose" (35 mAs) CT protocols. The absorbed dose levels for radiosensitive organs in the maxillofacial region during the exposure for both 3D-CT protocols were also measured.

Methods: The study population consisted of 15 human dry skulls examined with spiral 3D-CT. 12 cephalometric anatomical landmarks at 7 sites were identified on the 3D-CT surface renderings by 2 observers independently, twice each, using high-dose and low-dose protocols. In total, 1440 imaging measurements were made. Thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) were placed at ten sites around the thyroid and submandibular glands and the eyes in an Alderson phantom for measuring the absorbed dose levels.

Results: The intraobserver mean distances between 3D landmarks were smaller for all sites with the high-dose protocol (P = 0.37). There was a significant difference among the observers (P = 0.000004). Interobserver mean distances between 3D landmarks were smaller for four of the seven sites with the low-dose protocol. However, the global interobserver mean distances between 3D landmarks for all sites were smaller with the high-dose protocol (P = 0.028). The low-dose protocol reduced the radiation dose to the thyroid by 6.12, to the submandibular salivary glands by 5.91 and to the eye by 5.44, resulting in a global reduction factor of 5.71.

Conclusions: The accuracy in the landmark's identification was maintained when the milliampere-second values were reduced from 200 mAs to 35 mAs. We recommend use of the low-dose protocol for clinical 3D-CT cephalometric applications.

Keywords: three-dimensional; computed tomography; cephalometry; dose reduction