DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asaumi, J-I
Right arrow Articles by Konouchi, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asaumi, J-I
Right arrow Articles by Konouchi, H
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2008) 37, 340-343
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31214423


RESEARCH

Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken at the initial visit at a department of paediatric dentistry

J-I Asaumi*,1,2, M Hisatomi1, Y Yanagi2, T Unetsubo1, Y Maki2, H Matsuzaki2, Y Honda1 and H Konouchi2

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Field of Tumor Biology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan; 2Department of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Hospital of Medicine and Dentistry, Okayama, Japan

*Correspondence to: Jun-ichi Asaumi, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Field of Tumor Biology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5-1 Shikata-cho, 2-chome, Okayama 700-8525, Japan. E-mail: asaumi{at}md.okayama-u.ac.jp

Received 10 September 2007; revised 5 October 2007; accepted 23 October 2007

Objectives: To examine oral and maxillofacial lesions other than those related to the chief complaint in panoramic radiographs taken at the department of paediatric dentistry at our hospital.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all 1092 patients who had visited the department of paediatric dentistry at our hospital and had a panoramic radiograph taken between August 1999 and October 2004. The following information was obtained from the patients' files and panoramic radiographs: gender, age, chief complaints and the presence or absence of lesions.

Results: Lesions were observed in 140 of the 1092 panoramic radiographs (12.8%). Among the 140 patients discovered to have lesions in the panoramic radiographs, 66 (47.1%, or 6.05% of the entire group of 1092 patients) had different lesions from those underlying the chief complaint. These 66 patients ages ranged from 3 years to 14 years and the lesions involved 39 (59.1%) missing teeth, 20 (30.3%) mesiodentes, 4 supernumerary teeth, 1 odontoma, 1 radicular cyst and 1 impacted tooth. The missing teeth were observed in the central and lateral incisor, canine, and first and second premolar positions of both jaws, especially in the lower lateral incisor and upper central incisor positions.

Conclusions: We were able to detect incidental lesions at a rate of 6.05% (66 of 1092 patients) and at a relatively early age (mean 6.8 years) in the present study. Early treatment of these lesions could avoid maxillofacial deformity and other complications.

Keywords: panoramic radiograph; incidentally; missing tooth; mesiodens







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.