DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahl, C R W
Right arrow Articles by Fontanella, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahl, C R W
Right arrow Articles by Fontanella, V
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2008) 37, 438-444
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/58263510


RESEARCH

Evaluation by digital subtraction radiography of induced changes in the bone density of the female rat mandible

C R W Mahl and V Fontanella*

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

*Correspondence to: Rua Coronel Paulino Teixeira, 169/403, 90420–160 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; E-mail: vaniafontanella{at}terra.com.br

Received 6 September 2007; revised 8 December 2007; accepted 11 December 2007

Objectives: To verify whether changes in bone mass induced by glucocorticoid and bisphosphonate can be detected by digital subtraction radiography of lateral X-rays in female rat mandibles.

Methods: 36 Rattus norvegicus (Wistar) females were randomly allocated to three groups: Group 1, control (n = 12); Group 2, induced osteopaenia (n = 12); and Group 3, induced osteopaenia plus risedronate (n = 12). Group 1 received subcutaneous saline solution (2 ml kg–1) injections for 12 weeks. Group 2 received 1 mg kg–1 methylprednisolone acetate for 12 weeks. Group 3 received the same treatment as Group 2, plus 3 mg kg–1 risedronate sodium for a further 12 weeks. A radiograph of the left mandible was taken on day 0 and after 12 weeks. A third radiograph was taken in Group 3 after risedronate treatment. Digital subtraction of the radiographs was used to compare the intensity of pixels in the control area and the test area. The animals were killed and the same area assessed by subtraction was histologically evaluated.

Results: ANOVA revealed statistically significant histological differences between the three groups. Tukey's multiple comparisons test showed that Group 2 had the smallest mean proportion of bone trabeculae per field and Group 3 the largest (F = 37.56; P < 0.01). Radiographic subtraction revealed a higher mean pixel intensity in Groups 1 and 3 vs Group 2. In Group 3, glucocorticoid caused a significant loss in radiographic density, and risedronate restored that loss (Friedman's non-parametric test).

Conclusions: Subtraction radiography was able to detect changes in bone mass induced by glucocorticoid and bisphosphonate.

Keywords: bisphosphonates; glucocorticoids; subtraction technique; osteoporosis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.