DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brunese, L
Right arrow Articles by Sodano, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brunese, L
Right arrow Articles by Sodano, A
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2008) 37, 464-469
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/79964183


RESEARCH

Pleomorphic adenoma of parotid gland: delayed enhancement on computed tomography

L Brunese*,1, R Ciccarelli3, S Fucili2, A Romeo2, G Napolitano2, V D'Auria2, A Collina2, L Califano2, S Cappabianca3 and A Sodano2

1Department of Health Sciences, Università del Molise, Contrada Tappino, Campobasso, Italy; 2Department of Radiology, Federico II University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy; 3Department of Radiology, Seconda Università, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy

*Correspondence to: Dr Luca Brunese, Department of Radiology, Università del Molise, Contrada Tappino, Campobasso, Molise 86100, Italy; E-mail: lucabrunese{at}libero.it

Received 12 September 2007; revised 10 December 2007; accepted 11 December 2007

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of multiphasic CT with 8 min delayed acquisition in the differential diagnosis between pleomorphic adenomas and other parotid neoplasias.

Methods: Between January 2004 and April 2007, 62 patients with parotid enlargement were enrolled in this prospective study. The CT protocol applied included the following four acquisitions: without contrast medium and 30 s, 120 s and 8 min after intravenous injection of contrast medium. We considered the degree of the enhancement of the lesions (rated as "low", "moderate" and "strong") and the degree of enhancement homogeneity (rated as "not homogeneous", "mildly homogeneous" and "uniform"). These parameters were compared with Hounsfield values of the lesions computed in each phase. The diagnosis was confirmed in all patients after surgery.

Results: On histological examination, 36 tumours were classified as pleomorphic adenomas and 26 as non-pleomorphic adenomas. On the basis of a statistical comparison, the third phase proved to be the most effective in the differential diagnosis between pleomorphic adenoma and non-pleomorphic adenomas, both for the assessment of the degree of the enhancement (in this phase, strong enhancement showed a sensitivity of 61.11%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 53.33%) and, above all, for the homogeneity of the enhancement (in this phase, indeed, uniform enhancement showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 100%).

Conclusions: Our results seem to indicate that multiphasic CT with 8 min delayed acquisition allows the differential diagnosis between pleomorphic adenomas and other parotid neoplasias.

Keywords: adenoma, parotid, computed tomography, pleomorphic







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.