DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sumer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Celenk, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sumer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Celenk, P
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009) 38, 23-27
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/20664232


RESEARCH

Ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of intraosseous lesions of the jaws

AP Sumer*,1, M Danaci2, E Özen Sandikçi3, M Sumer3 and P Celenk1

1Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Samsun, Turkey; 2Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Samsun, Turkey; 3Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsun, Turkey

*Correspondence to: Dr A Pinar Sumer, Ondokuzmayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, 55139 Samsun, Turkey. E-mail: psumer1970{at}yahoo.com

Received 26 November 2007; revised 4 February 2008; accepted 12 February 2008

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography and colour and power Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosis of intraosseous lesions of the jaws and to correlate the contents of the lesion with the histological findings.

Methods: This study included 20 patients referred to the oral surgery clinic for treatment. All patients had intraosseous jaw lesions in the maxilla or mandible. Ultrasonographic examinations were performed and, according to the ultrasonography findings, the jaw lesions were classified into three groups: cystic, semisolid and solid. Additionally, colour and power Doppler ultrasonography examinations were performed to evaluate blood flow in all patients. After the ultrasonography examination, the patients underwent surgical treatment. The correlation between ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography findings of the lesions and histological findings was investigated.

Results: 22 lesions were identified in 20 patients. Of the five lesions with histological findings of inflammatory granulation tissue, ultrasonography identified four of them that showed a solid appearance. Vascularization was detected in both internal and external areas of these lesions with colour and power Doppler ultrasonography. Of the 17 odontogenic cystic lesions, the ultrasonography examination showed a simple cystic appearance in 5 lesions, a complex cystic appearance in 3 lesions, a semisolid appearance in 6 lesions and a solid appearance in 1 lesion. Two lesions were inconclusive on ultrasonographic examination.

Conclusions: Ultrasonography can provide accurate information on the content of intraosseous lesions of the jaws before any surgical procedure. Additionally, Doppler ultrasound can show vascularization of the lesion. However, there was no correlation between the ultrasound findings and the definitive histological diagnosis.

Keywords: ultrasound, colour power Doppler, jaws, diagnosis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.