DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasar, F
Right arrow Articles by Akgünlü, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasar, F
Right arrow Articles by Akgünlü, F
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009) 38, 86-91
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/56808511


RESEARCH

Mandibular cortical index evaluation in masked and unmasked panoramic radiographs

F Yasar, S Sener, E Yesilova and F Akgünlü

Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Kampüs Selcuklu, Konya, Turkey

*Correspondence to: Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Kampüs Selcuklu, Konya, Turkey;. E-mail: drfyasar{at}hotmail.com

Received 24 October 2007; revised 6 February 2007; accepted 15 February 2007

Objectives: The first aim of this study was to evaluate intra- and interobserver agreement in evaluating the mandibular cortical index (MCI) in masked and unmasked panoramic radiographs. The second aim was to evaluate the effect of previous experience of MCI classification on the observers' performance.

Methods: Three observers separately evaluated MCI, twice in masked and twice in unmasked panoramic radiographs, with 2 week intervals. The observations were repeated more than 9 months later. The second and third observers were inexperienced in evaluating MCI. Weighted kappa statistics were used to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Results: In the first session of the study, the kappa values for intraobserver agreements in masked panoramic radiographs were between 0.565 and 0.789; in unmasked panoramic radiographs, they were between 0.420 and 0.732. The kappa values for interobserver agreement were between 0.131 and 0.392 in masked radiographs and between 0.043 and 0.225 in unmasked radiographs. In the second session of the study, the kappa values for intraobserver agreements in masked panoramic radiographs were between 0.586 and 0.786. The kappa values for intraobserver agreements in unmasked panoramic radiographs were between 0.558 and 0.781. The kappa values for interobserver agreement were between 0.146 and 0.510 in masked radiographs and between 0.174 and 0.568 in unmasked radiographs.

Conclusions: Masking has no effect on the evaluation of panoramic radiographs for MCI. Previous experience causes higher intraobserver agreement. Intra- and interobserver agreement increases along with the increased experience in MCI evaluations.

Keywords: mandibular cortical index; viewing conditions; panoramic radiography; repeatability







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.