DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rehman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rehman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009) 38, 239-244
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/12945701


RESEARCH

Bifid mandibular condyle with associated temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a computed tomography study of the patterns and morphological variations

TA Rehman*,1, S Gibikote1, N Ilango2, J Thaj3, R Sarawagi1 and A Gupta2

1Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India; 2Department of Plastic Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India; 3Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Whiston Hospital, Liverpool, UK

*Correspondence to: Thaj Abdul Rehman, Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India; E-mail: taj_ar{at}yahoo.com

Received 31 December 2007; revised 1 May 2008; accepted 5 May 2008

Objectives: Bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) with associated temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA) is extremely rare with only four cases reported. We present the first case series of BMC with TMJA in an attempt to elucidate the morphological pattern in this rare condition.

Methods: Retrospective examination of CTs over a period of 6 years revealed 37 patients with TMJA, of whom 10 had BMC. Clinical and CT features of these were analysed. Patients were grouped according to sides of involvement and orientation of condyles.

Results: The male:female ratio was 1:1. Nine were post-traumatic and one post-infectious. The aetiology was sustained in childhood in all patients. Six patients had unilateral BMCs and four had bilateral. One patient had bilateral BMCs with bilateral TMJA. This was anteroposterior (AP) in orientation. Three patients had bilateral BMCs with unilateral TMJA, among which one was AP and two mediolateral (ML). Six patients had unilateral BMC with ipsilateral TMJA; all of the ML anterior condylar process was ankylosed in joints with AP BMC and TMJA. Lateral condylar process was ankylosed in post-traumatic ML BMC with TMJA, while the medial condylar process ankylosed in the post-infectious patient. In general, ankylosed heads were found to be larger, sclerotic and often mushroom shaped compared with non-ankylosed heads.

Conclusions: This series attempts to elucidate patterns of ankylosis and CT morphology in BMC with associated TMJA. Also included are hitherto unreported cases such as bilateral AP BMC with TMJA and post-infectious BMC with TMJA.

Keywords: bifid mandibular condyle; temporomandibular joint ankylosis; computed tomography







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.