DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, F
Right arrow Articles by Malasoma, R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, F
Right arrow Articles by Malasoma, R
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009) 38, 387-392
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/29929241

RESEARCH

Dental magnetic resonance imaging: study of impacted mandibular third molars

F Ferretti*, M Malventi and R Malasoma

Radiologic Division, Dental Service, Hospital of Livorno, Italy

*Correspondence to: Fabio Ferretti, Department of Radiology, Hospital of Livorno, Viale Alfieri 36, Livorno 57100, Italy; E-mail: f.ferretti{at}nord.usl6.toscana.it

Received 15 January 2007; revised 29 May 2008; accepted 26 June 2008

Objectives: To assess the usefulness of MRI in the evaluation of the relationships between the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars.

Methods: 29 young patients from our hospital dental service, all with a unilateral impacted mandibular third molar, were investigated with MR and the anatomical details were evaluated in three dimensions by two MR-experienced radiologists from our radiology division. MR images were obtained by using a 1.0 T Siemens Magnetom Expert unit with a radiofrequency (RF) head coil. T1 weighted axial oblique images and proton density-weighted sagittal/coronal oblique images were acquired in order to evaluate the anatomical details in the three dimensions.

Results: In all of the cases it was possible to evaluate the depth of the third molar in the alveolar bone, its inclination towards the occlusal plane and the relationships with the mandibular canal, but in 2 of 29 cases it was not possible to distinguish the mandibular canal from the third molar because of magnetic susceptibility artefacts.

Conclusions: Owing to the possibility of inferior alveolar nerve injury during oral surgery, where dental panoramic radiography is not sufficient to demonstrate the relationships between mandibular third molar teeth and the mandibular canal, a dental CT scan is often needed; however, in young patients, to avoid high levels of radiation dose, MRI of the jaw may be useful.

Keywords: mandibular canal; third molar; impacted tooth; magnetic resonance imaging; mandible






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.