DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benchimol, D
Right arrow Articles by Shi, X.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benchimol, D
Right arrow Articles by Shi, X.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009) 38, 407-412
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/22255081


RESEARCH

Evaluation of automatic exposure control in a direct digital intraoral system

D Benchimol, K Näsström and XQ Shi

Institute of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

Received 24 June 2008; revised 4 December 2008; accepted 29 December 2008

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the automatic exposure control (AEC) in an intraoral digital system.

Methods: Three series of radiographs were captured with the activated AEC on seven dry mandibles adhered to different thicknesses of Plexiglas®, which represented soft tissue. Exposure times required for each radiograph of the specimens were analysed as functions of the added Plexiglas thickness. Differences in mean grey levels between pairs of the three images obtained from the same specimen were analysed by employing the subtraction technique. Additionally, four radiographs of all seven mandibles were manually exposed with one layer of Plexiglas, which employed one and two steps below and above the registered automatic exposure time. Six observers evaluated the series of radiographs exposed with one layer of Plexiglas in a random order. The observers were instructed to classify the quality of the diagnostic images as unacceptable, acceptable or excellent.

Results: The results demonstrated a good correlation between the exposure times determined by AEC and Plexiglas thickness (r  =  0.85). Mean grey level values for subtraction images obtained from radiographs exposed with different thickness of Plexiglas with activated AEC indicated that almost identical radiographs were obtained, regardless of the Plexiglas thickness. The subjective observer evaluation of the most satisfactory radiographic image quality as a function of exposure time demonstrated that the highest scores were for radiographs exposed with the AEC function activated.

Conclusions: The AEC function may accurately determine the appropriate exposure times related to object thickness, providing radiographs with satisfactory image quality, and may thus be advantageous in clinical radiographic work.

Keywords: radiography; digital radiography; dental; automatic exposure control







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.